Dr. Darrell Bock

Dallas Theological Seminary

 

“Breaking The Da Vinci Code, Part 2”

The Missing Gospels and Orthodoxy

 

 

The Current Situation and How We Got Here

   Walter Bauer

   “The New School” - Pagels, King, Ehrman, Koester

   The Many Recent Books

   The Popularization

   The Basic Claims on Orthodoxy and Alternative Christianities

 

List of texts (32 plus 6)

   Apocalypse of Peter

   Apocryphon of James

   Apocryphon of John

   Dialogue of the Savior

   Eugnostos the Blessed

   Excerpta ex Theodoto

   Gospel(s) of Bartholomew

   Gospel of the Egyptians

   Gospel of Mary Magdalene

   Gospel of Judas

   Gospel of Nicodemus (= Acts of Pilate)

   Gospel of Peter

   Gospel of Philip

   Gospel of the Savior

   Gospel of Thomas

   Gospel of Thomas the Contender

   Protoevangelium of James

   the Infancy Gospel of Thomas

   the Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew

   Gospel of Truth

   Hypostasis of the Archons

   Interpretation of Knowledge

   Letter to Rheginos (= Treatise on the Resurrection)

   Pistis Sophia

   Second Treatise of the Great Seth

   Sophia of Jesus Christ

   Teachings of Silvanus

   Treatise on the Resurrection (see Letter to Rheginos)

   Tripartite Tractate

   A Valentinian Exposition

   Fragments: Papyrus Egerton 2

   Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 840

   the Strasbourg Coptic Papyrus

   Mentioned by not found: Gospel of the Hebrews

   Gospel of the Nazareans

   Gospel of the Ebionites

 

The Materials

   The Nature of the Missing Gospels

   The Movements that Produced Them

   How Are They Like and Unlike the Gospels We Know

 

The Real Issue

   The Relationship between Canon and Orthodoxy

   The Deeper Question: How Did Orthodoxy Get Communicated before There Was a Functioning NT?

 

The Test: Four Basic Themes and the Key

   God and Creation

   The Person of Jesus

   The Nature and Scope of Salvation

   The Work of Jesus

   Key: Doctrinal Summaries to Remember Teaching, Hymns, Acts of Worship (Lord’s Table)

 

God and Creation

   Apocryphon of John - mid 2nd century

   Contrast with OT

   Importance

 

Apocryphon of John

The Apocryphon of John II 2:33–4:10 is a long description of God’s uniqueness. He is “more than a god, nothing is above him” (2:35). He is illimitable, total perfection, immeasurable, invisible, eternal, unnamable, pure, holy, not corporeal, and superior from other beings among a variety of attributes. He is an “aeon giving aeon” (4:3). He is at rest (4:11). It was his thought that performed a deed and she came forth (4:27). She is the “forethought of the All” (4:31–32) and the glory of the Barbelo (4:36). The Barbelo is the invisible, virginal Spirit (5:13). Next is named a series of aeons that came from the Father (6:2–10).

 

Apocryphon

The key event follows. Sophia, an aeon herself, conceives of a thought from herself (9:2526). She sought to conceive without her consorts consent (9:34). What she produced was imperfect and different from her appearance (10:4), a lion-faced serpent called Yaltabaoth, the first archon to take power from his mother (10:919). He is also called the Great Ruler. Here is the start of evil, emerging from an act independent of the highest God. A woman, Sophia, acts on her own. She repents and asks for forgiveness (13:3614:10).

 

Apocryphon

Yaltabaoth moves to create the first man, which chapters 15 and 16 detail part by part. Later, the command of the Mother-Father of all sends five lights to Yaltabaoth to tell him to breathe into the being a breath. Unknown to him, Yaltabaoth breathes into the body an element of power from his mother. The being moves, coming to life (19:1533). The archons will have power over the natural and perceptible body, but in him was an Epinoia, hidden in Adam that was the correction of the mothers deficiency (20:929).

 

Person of Jesus

   Claims about Gospel of Thomas (early 2nd century)

   Sayings 77 and 13 Apocalypse of Peter 81:7-23- 3rd century

   Contrast with Traditional and Modern Handlings

 

Thomas

Saying 77: “Jesus said, ‘It is I who am the light which is above them all. It is I who am the all. From me did the all come forth, and unto me did the all extend. Split a piece of wood, and I am there. Lift up the stone, and you will find me there’”

 

Thomas

Saying 13: Jesus said to his disciples, Compare me to someone and tell me whom I am like. Simon Peter said to him, You are like a righteous angel. Matthew said to him, You are like a wise philosopher. Thomas said to him, Master, my mouth is wholly incapable of saying who you are like. Jesus replied, I am not your (2nd person sing) master. Because you (sing) have drunk, you (sing) have become intoxicated from the bubbling spring which I have measured out.’” Jesus then takes Thomas aside for a private discussion. When the disciples ask Thomas about the conversation, he replies that if he mentioned any of the things, they would pick up stones, and fire would come out of the stones and burn them.

 

Points from Thomas

First, there is high Christology because Jesus role is inexpressible. Second, there is emphasis on a held secret, not to be revealed to everyone, reflecting the elite and secret side of this movement. Third, Jesus response has Thomass reply about being incomparable especially in mind and affirms the inexpressible Jesus over the other options. Those who embrace Thomass reply know something that others do not.

 

Apocalypse of Peter 81:7-23

I [Peter] said, What am I seeing, O Lord? Is it you yourself whom they take? And are you holding on to me? Who is this one above the cross, who is glad and laughing? And is it another person whose feet and hands they are hammering?” The Savior said to me, “He whom you see above the cross, glad and laughing, is the living Jesus. But he into whose hands and feet they are driving the nails is his physical part, which is the substitute. They are putting to shame that which is his likeness.”

 

Salvation

   Thomas- saying 29

   Saying 114

   Rheginos (Treatise on the Resurrection) - late 2nd century 47:24-48:6

   Significance

 

Thomas

29: “If the flesh came into being because of the spirit, it is a wonder. But if the spirit came into being because of the body, it is a wonder of wonders. Indeed, I am amazed at how this great wealth has made its home in this poverty”

 

Thomas

114: In it Peter seeks to send Mary away because she is not worthy of kingdom life as a woman. Jesus replies, “I myself shall lead her in order to make her male, so that she may become a living spirit resembling you males. For every woman who will make herself male will enter the kingdom.”

 

Rheginos 47:24-48:6

Nothing, then, redeems us from this world. But the All which we are, we are saved. We have received salvation from end to end. Let us think this way! Let us comprehend this way! But there are some (who) wish to understand, in the enquiry about those things they are looking into, whether he who is saved, if he leaves his body behind, will be saved immediately. Let no one doubt concerning this, . . . indeed, the visible members which are dead shall not be saved, for (only) the living [members] which exist within them would arise.What, then, is the resurrection? It is always the disclosure of those who have risen.

 

Jesus’ Work

   Thomas saying 111

   Apocalypse of Peter 70:14-71:5

   Traditional Materials

 

Thomas

111: “Jesus said, ‘The heavens and earth will be rolled up in your presence. And the one who lives from the living one will not see death.’ Does not Jesus say, ‘Whoever finds himself is superior to the world’?”

 

Apocalypse of Peter 70:21-71:5

Peter, blessed are those belonging to the Father, for they are heavenly. It is he (i.e., the Father) who revealed life, to those who are from life, through me. I reminded those who are built on what is strong, that they should heed my instruction and distinguish between words of unrighteousness and transgression of law (on the one hand), and righteousness (on the other), since they are from the height of every word of this fullness of truth. Graciously they have been enlightened by him whom the principalities sought.

 

Early Belief in the 2nd Century

There was one Creator God. Jesus was both human and divine; He truly suffered and was raised bodily. He also is worthy to receive worship. Salvation was about liberation from hostile forces, but it also was about sin and forgivenessthe need to fix a flaw in humanity that made each person culpable before the Creator. This salvation was the realization of promises that God made to the world and to Israel through Israels Law and Prophets. The one person, Jesus Christ, brought this salvation not only by revealing the way to God and making reconciliation but also by providing for that way through His death for sin. Resurrection into a new exalted spiritual life involves salvation of the entire personspirit, soul, and body. Faith in this work of God through Jesus saves and brings on a spiritual life that will never end. This was the orthodoxy of the earliest tradition.

 

Early Faith Stated as Four Points

This orthodoxy can also be stated in terms of what was to be excluded and included:

(1)  God was not to be divided in such a way that He was not the Creator. God was a Creator of all things, and that initial creation was good.

(2)  A division between Jesus and the Christ in terms of His basic person and work was not acceptable. Orthodoxy was that Jesus came truly in the flesh and truly suffered.

(3)  Redemption only on a spiritual plane was not the true faith. Salvation included a physical dimension of resurrection and extended into the material creation.

(4)  Jesus did not come only to point the way to faith, to be a prophet, merely a teacher of religious wisdom, or to be a mere example of religious faith. Rather, His work provided the means to salvation. Jesus was more than a prophet, which is why He was worshipped.

 

Summary: What Was Orthodoxy and What Was Not

Crossing Any of The Four Points Led to a Charge of Not Being Orthodox

 

Four Points History Teaches

(1)  The claim that Gnostic Christians existed alongside orthodox Christians at the start of Christianity is simply false.

 

(2)  Gnosticism was not the first unorthodox belief on the block. The Marcionite heresy likely preceded it (not to mention the Ebionites).

 

(3)  Yet another falsehood that revisionist historians espouse is that there was no core belief system in the first century that could later be called orthodoxy. To show this has been a major burden of our tour. Each of our four topics surfaced core teaching.

 

(4)  The adoption of the Hebrew Scriptures as canon meant that Gnosticism would have never been recognized as a legitimate development of the Christian faith. The view of the Creator God was most important in the rejection of Gnosticism and Gnostic Christians.